On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > > On 22 Dec 2017, at 3:48 am, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > 2) For the transition technology discussion I believe it centered around > > attempting to get a /48 to each 'site' (home/customer) and doing ds-lite > as > > the transition technology in use. > > (map the customer to not a /128 in the ds-lite, but a /48) > > I think you mean 6rd. DS-Lite doesn’t use any extra IPv6 addresses. > > yes, sure, it was some time ago that the discussion happened :(
> 6rd can be poorly done by embedding the entire IPv4 address in the IPv6 > address. Doing that does waste space. > > 6rd deployment should not require much more IPv6 /48’s than a native IPv6 > deployment would. That does require properly configuring your DHCPv4 > servers with DIFFERENT 6rd DHCPv4 Option values on a per IPv4 DHCP pool > basis which I’m sure every ISP here is capable of doing as there is nothing > really new here to do. You have all carved up IPv4 assignments into IPv4 > pools. This is no different. You carve up a IPv6 assignments into similar > sized pools of /48’s then set the 6rd DHCPv4 Option to the appropriate > values for that IPv4 to IPv6 pool mapping. Add the mapping to the BRs and > you are done. > > Mark > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org > >
