On 10/8/16, Hank Nussbacher <h...@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: > On 07/10/2016 17:59, Lee wrote: >> On 10/7/16, Hank Nussbacher <h...@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: >>> On 07/10/2016 00:33, Lee wrote: >>>> dunno about creating web pages, but >>>> https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=785 >>>> has a section on showing filters that are defined but not referenced & >>>> referenced but not defined >>> In IOS-XR it is one command "sho rpl unused ?" >>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:petach-tikva-gp#show rpl unused ? >>> as-path-set Display as-path-set objects >>> community-set Display community-set objects >>> extcommunity-set Display extended community objects >>> prefix-set Display prefix-set objects >>> rd-set Display rd-set objects >>> route-policy Display route-policy objects >>> tag-set Display tag-set objects >>> >>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:petach-tikva-gp#show rpl unused prefix >>> Fri Oct 7 08:24:53.237 IDT >>> >>> ACTIVE -- Referenced by at least one policy which is attached >>> INACTIVE -- Only referenced by policies which are not attached >>> UNUSED -- Not attached (directly or indirectly) and not referenced >> I'm actually starting to miss being out of the game. I'm retired, so >> don't have access to anything running IOS-XR. Just out of curiosity, >> how does the output of 'show rpl unused prefix' compare to the output >> of the script at http://pastebin.com/pem7tHAJ >> >> Thanks, >> Lee >> > Samples: > <.. snip samples ..> interesting.. thanks!
> Note the sloppy code - sometimes they state UNUSED and sometimes > (UNUSED). Or "the following policies are"... rather than "the following > routing policies are". Just plain sloppy Cisco coding and poor QA. And > once you delete these unreferenced objects, "show rpl unused" will still > show them since there is a bug in Cisco code (CSCuy07932/CSCug9153). See: > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/192481 > for details. Which is why I like having the source code -- there's the possibility of fixing whatever myself instead of having to wait for the vendor to fix it :) Thanks, Lee
