On 07/10/2016 17:59, Lee wrote: > On 10/7/16, Hank Nussbacher <h...@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: >> On 07/10/2016 00:33, Lee wrote: >>> dunno about creating web pages, but >>> https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=785 >>> has a section on showing filters that are defined but not referenced & >>> referenced but not defined >> In IOS-XR it is one command "sho rpl unused ?" >> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:petach-tikva-gp#show rpl unused ? >> as-path-set Display as-path-set objects >> community-set Display community-set objects >> extcommunity-set Display extended community objects >> prefix-set Display prefix-set objects >> rd-set Display rd-set objects >> route-policy Display route-policy objects >> tag-set Display tag-set objects >> >> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:petach-tikva-gp#show rpl unused prefix >> Fri Oct 7 08:24:53.237 IDT >> >> ACTIVE -- Referenced by at least one policy which is attached >> INACTIVE -- Only referenced by policies which are not attached >> UNUSED -- Not attached (directly or indirectly) and not referenced > I'm actually starting to miss being out of the game. I'm retired, so > don't have access to anything running IOS-XR. Just out of curiosity, > how does the output of 'show rpl unused prefix' compare to the output > of the script at http://pastebin.com/pem7tHAJ > > Thanks, > Lee > Samples:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:petach-tikva-gp#sho rpl unused as-path Sat Oct 8 20:03:22.975 IDT ACTIVE -- Referenced by at least one policy which is attached INACTIVE -- Only referenced by policies which are not attached UNUSED -- Not attached (directly or indirectly) and not referenced The following as-path-sets are UNUSED ------------------------------------------ aspath_191_p1_permit P/0/RSP0/CPU0:petach-tikva-gp#sho rpl unused prefix Sat Oct 8 20:03:56.826 IDT ACTIVE -- Referenced by at least one policy which is attached INACTIVE -- Only referenced by policies which are not attached UNUSED -- Not attached (directly or indirectly) and not referenced The following prefix-sets are UNUSED ------------------------------------------ aspath_191_permit RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:petach-tikva-gp#sho rpl unused comm Sat Oct 8 20:04:20.953 IDT ACTIVE -- Referenced by at least one policy which is attached INACTIVE -- Only referenced by policies which are not attached UNUSED -- Not attached (directly or indirectly) and not referenced The following community-sets are UNUSED ------------------------------------------ 378:3300 378:65379 P/0/RSP0/CPU0:petach-tikva-gp#sho rpl unused rout Sat Oct 8 20:05:22.857 IDT ACTIVE -- Referenced by at least one policy which is attached INACTIVE -- Only referenced by policies which are not attached UNUSED -- Not attached (directly or indirectly) and not referenced The following policies are (UNUSED) ------------------------------------------ GEANT-QoS tagIIXroutes Note the sloppy code - sometimes they state UNUSED and sometimes (UNUSED). Or "the following policies are"... rather than "the following routing policies are". Just plain sloppy Cisco coding and poor QA. And once you delete these unreferenced objects, "show rpl unused" will still show them since there is a bug in Cisco code (CSCuy07932/CSCug9153). See: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/192481 for details. -Hank