> On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:30 PM, Donn Lasher via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > > On 7/28/16, 10:17 AM, "NANOG on behalf of J. Oquendo" > <nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of joque...@e-fensive.net> wrote: > > >> While many are chanting: #NetworkLivesMatter, I have yet >> to see, read, or hear about any network provider being >> the first to set precedence by either de-peering, or >> blocking traffic from Cloudflare. There is a lot of >> keyboard posturing: "I am mad and I am not going to take >> it anymore" hooplah but no one is lifting a finger to >> do anything other than regurgitate "I am mad... This is >> criminal." > > (long discussion, was waiting for a place to jump in..) > > If we want to be accurate about it, Cloudflare doesn’t host the DDoS, they > protect the website of seller of the product. We shouldn’t be de-peering > Cloud Flare over sites they protect any more than we would de-peer GoDaddy > over sites they host, some of which, no doubt, sell gray/black market/illegal > items/services. > > If, on the other hand, you can find a specific network actually generating > the volumes of DDoS, you should have a conversation about de-peering…. > > $0.02… >
It would be nice however if Cloudflare would announce there “freebie” ciders and the IP block that host their paying customers. Most of the abuse centers on the free clients.
