On 7/28/16, 10:17 AM, "NANOG on behalf of J. Oquendo" <nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of joque...@e-fensive.net> wrote:
>While many are chanting: #NetworkLivesMatter, I have yet >to see, read, or hear about any network provider being >the first to set precedence by either de-peering, or >blocking traffic from Cloudflare. There is a lot of >keyboard posturing: "I am mad and I am not going to take >it anymore" hooplah but no one is lifting a finger to >do anything other than regurgitate "I am mad... This is >criminal." (long discussion, was waiting for a place to jump in..) If we want to be accurate about it, Cloudflare doesn’t host the DDoS, they protect the website of seller of the product. We shouldn’t be de-peering Cloud Flare over sites they protect any more than we would de-peer GoDaddy over sites they host, some of which, no doubt, sell gray/black market/illegal items/services. If, on the other hand, you can find a specific network actually generating the volumes of DDoS, you should have a conversation about de-peering…. $0.02…
