In message <20160601103707.7de9d...@envy.e5.y.home>, Tore Anderson writes: > * Baldur Norddahl > > > It goes to the USA and back again. They would need NAT64 servers in > > every region and then let the DNS64 service decide which one is close > > to you by encoding the region information in the returned IPv6 > > address. Such as 2001:470:64:[region number]::/96. > > > > An anycast solution would need a distributed NAT64 implementation, > > such that the NAT64 servers could somehow synchronize state. > > Or you could simply accept that active sessions are torn down whenever > the routing topology changes enough to flip traffic to the anycast > prefix to another NAT64 instance in a different region. > > It would be no different from any other anycasted service.
But some services are inherently short lived. NAT64 has no such property. > Tore -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
