On 31/May/16 01:28, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>> >> >> It goes to the USA and back again. They would need NAT64 servers in every >> region and then let the DNS64 service decide which one is close to you by >> encoding the region information in the returned IPv6 address. Such as >> 2001:470:64:[region number]::/96. >> >> An anycast solution would need a distributed NAT64 implementation, such >> that the NAT64 servers could somehow synchronize state. A more simple >> solution is just to have the DNS64 be anycast and have a DNS64 at each >> NAT64 location with the DNS64 returning pointers to the local NAT64. That is what we do. We've got NAT64 routers deployed at every PoP/region, to keep NAT64 state local and more predictable. Needless to say, the distribution reduces the impact of the "CG" from the "CG-NAT64". Mark.
