Ok that would be a bad idea. Nat64 is not stateless so to anycast it would be unstable.
Sorry time to get to sleep. Regards Baldur Den 30. maj 2016 03.25 skrev "Baldur Norddahl" <baldur.nordd...@gmail.com>: > Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the > 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service. > Den 30. maj 2016 03.08 skrev "Tim Durack" <tdur...@gmail.com>: > >> For the record: >> >> Tim, >> >> I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this >> thread: >> >> https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html >> >> but I figured I'd let you know that: >> >> https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64 >> >> is now available for testing. Perhaps it will be some use. >> >> Regards, >> -Erik >> >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service? >> > >> > Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point >> > the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network. >> > >> > Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-) >> > >> > -- >> > Tim:> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Tim:> >> >
