While we will get us there eventually it will be at the considerably more expensive for everyone involved. There is also a distinct lack of a working free market in most of the world. There isn't one in Australia. From what I read there isn't one in most of the developed nations in the world including the US.
Mark On 17/12/2015, at 11:14 AM, Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org> wrote: > Mark, > > Why? Why do WE "need" to force people to bend to our will? The market will > get us all there eventually. > > I don't like what you eat. Lets put a surcharge on it to make you feel pain > and do what I want. :) > > -mel beckman > >> On Dec 16, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: >> >> This doesn't put pain on those that have enough addresses that they don't >> need >> to NAT yet. We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only. >> >> Mark >> >>> On 17/12/2015, at 10:39 AM, Charles Monson <charles.li...@camonson.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> We need to make IPv4 painful to use. Adding delay between SYN and SYN/ACK >>> would >>> be one way to achieve this. Start at 100ms..200ms and increase it by 100ms >>> each year. >>> >>> It seems like NAT would be another way to make IPv4 more painful to use. >>
