Hello Fabien, And why don't you use A10 for both detection and mitigation?
Thanks, Ramy On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Fabien Delmotte <fdelmot...@mac.com> wrote: > Hello > > My 2 cents > You can use Wanguard for the detection and A10 for the mitigation, you > have just to play with the API. > > Regards > > Fabien > > > Le 12 août 2015 à 16:28, Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihash...@gmail.com> a écrit > : > > > >> > >> > >> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200 > >> From: "marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr" <marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr> > >> To: nanog@nanog.org > >> Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions > >> Message-ID: <55c992de.3020...@yahoo.fr> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > >> > >> anybody from this impressive list ?: > >> > >> https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers > >> > >> -- Marcel > >> > >> > >> > > Anybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in the > > market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)? > > > > Another question, have anybody from the reviewers tested the false > > positives of the box, or experienced any false positive incidents? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ramy > >