Furst rule of dealing with $CABLECO — If you don’t like the answer you get on this phone call, redial. The next person will probably give you a different answer. Certainly you can almost always get the answer you are looking for (even if it’s wrong) within 5 calls if you are that patient.
Owen > On Jul 21, 2015, at 05:13 , Curtis Maurand <cmaur...@xyonet.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/20/2015 5:59 PM, Ricky Beam wrote: >> On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 06:45:43 -0400, Seth Mos <seth....@dds.nl> wrote: >>> For now, all the customers with the Ubee in bridge mode are SOL. It's not >>> clear what the reason is, but Ubee in bridge mode with IPv6 is listed on >>> the road map. If that's intentional policy or that the firmware isn't ready >>> yet is not clear at this point. >> >> Even in bridge mode, it's router is still active (and consuming an address >> -- which TWC eventually "fixed" by upping the number of allowed devices by >> one.) In TWC-BC land, the customer has no access to the CPE, so we cannot >> see anything beyond the login screen. >> >> ("user" -- non-priv account -- can be accessed on some of them, which is how >> I know the router is still active, but I cannot do anything about it.) >> >> The Arris DG1670A is passing IPv6 through properly. (I'm told it is "known >> broken", but it's the *one* out of three that works.) The Arris CM820A -- >> used for their hotspot -- doesn't appear to work correctly; my (win7) laptop >> got a DHCP ::/128 but then couldn't get anywhere. (IPv4 worked fine) >> >> [For the record, TWC-BC hands out a /56 no matter what you ask for.] > > At least in Maine where I am, TWC does allow you to bring your own modem as > long as it's DOCSIS 3 compliant and there's lots of those from motorola, > netgear and others. You're not stuck with the Ubee. > > -- > Best Regards > Curtis Maurand > Principal Xyonet Web Hosting > mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com > http://www.xyonet.com