>>> - when not using the RTR protocol but generating prefix-list >>> filters based on RPKI data, the devices might not support >>> sufficient entries. >> >> because the rpki generated acls are bigger and heavier than those in >> the irr. and they have trans-fats. > > I don't consider RPKI generated ACLs a 1 to 1 replacement for IRR based > filters. They might be used as supplement to each other.
the major user puts the rpki-generated pseudo-irr in front of the others in peval(0) order. same number of resulting acls. hence i do not understand your "the devices might not support sufficient entries." randy
