Waaay to many variables to answer the question. Each deployment is different and requires proper engineering and experience...
-Mike On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.des...@gmail.com> wrote: > A lot. It's a good point, but not very helpful to those engineers trying > to design said infrastructure. > On Jun 20, 2015 11:45 PM, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > > > So....ultimately, what's the answer? A huge number of low cost, low > > > power WAPs? Eager readers want to know. :) > > > > what was unclear about the following? > > > > Randy Bush wrote: > > > From: Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> > > > Subject: Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network > > setup? > > > To: Mike Lyon <mike.l...@gmail.com> > > > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> > > > Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 08:20:33 +0900 > > > ... > > > having been in the back seat for many deployments over the years with > > > all sorts of kit, i have seen great and reliable pretty large > > > deployments of all of the above (well, xirrus only once). i have seen > > > embarrassing messes with all of the above. i have concluded that the > > > critical component is the engineer. > > > -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
