> My understanding is that the most recent NANOG had issues with clients > picking channels sequentially vs by signal strength. There may have > been other issues but when all devices use 149 because that's the > first they can and they get link that's not good. > > If people know of tricks to solve this when there are 600-1000 devices > per room i am certain the NANOG eng team would love to know about it.
not really; they're in denial. why did san antonio work; the only nanog in 4 or more which did? why does ietf work? wireless is ugly. few know how to deploy at scale. it's just not easy. randy
