A lot. It's a good point, but not very helpful to those engineers trying to design said infrastructure. On Jun 20, 2015 11:45 PM, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote:
> > So....ultimately, what's the answer? A huge number of low cost, low > > power WAPs? Eager readers want to know. :) > > what was unclear about the following? > > Randy Bush wrote: > > From: Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> > > Subject: Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network > setup? > > To: Mike Lyon <mike.l...@gmail.com> > > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> > > Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 08:20:33 +0900 > > ... > > having been in the back seat for many deployments over the years with > > all sorts of kit, i have seen great and reliable pretty large > > deployments of all of the above (well, xirrus only once). i have seen > > embarrassing messes with all of the above. i have concluded that the > > critical component is the engineer. >
