> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > > - If you are already using IPoE, tell more why should I upgrade? > > The IPoE and IPoEoADSL I have done didn't need radius, didn't need BNG, didn't > need a lot of the complications you're talking about. It could basically be realised in > any decent L3 switch as default gateway for the customers instead of needing BNG. > > So I'd say if you want to get full potential of IPoE you need to do simplification as > well, otherwise there is little use in doing the work if he only thing you want to > change is from IPoPPPoE to IPoE encapsulation and keep all the other stuff you're > doing. > > IPoPPPoE requires special CPE and router at your end to achieve high speeds, > because they need to support encapsulation/decapsulation of packets at whatever > speed you provide. The number of devices that do this is a lot smaller than the > ones that do decent speeds with just IPoE. > > So some people will say migrating to IPoE from IPoPPPoE buys them nothing, > because they feel they need all the mechanisms they currently use. > Greenfield deployments might say "hey, we can do this without a lot of the needed > mechanisms for IPoPPPoE" and save a lot of money and complication. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
Thanks for your reply. I'm would like this simplicity if I could keep same
functionalities I have in PPPoE. By functionalities I mean:
- AAA
- Triple-ply services and classified accounting per service
- Possibility to suspend a user service in case of over-quota
- applying fair-share policies
Do I have any option to have simplicity and same functionality together?
Regards,
Nasser
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
