Please. Gmail isn't ever likely to use long dead hobbyist block lists. On Feb 12, 2015 9:38 PM, "Daniel Taylor" <dtay...@vocalabs.com> wrote:
> Possibly related: http://www.ahbl.org/content/changes-ahbl > > We had to manually remove it from spamassassin for our local installation, > and I am pretty sure that a lot of sites still haven't figured it out so > there's a lot of false positives being generated all over the place to > throw off even filters that don't use it directly. > > On 02/12/2015 09:54 AM, Alex Rubenstein wrote: > >> Mainly because I own it, and the people who use it. The server has been >> around 10+ years and has tight oversight. SPF is proper. This is a recent >> issue. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Scott Helms [mailto:khe...@zcorum.com] >> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 10:51 AM >> To: Alex Rubenstein >> Cc: Josh Luthman; NANOG list >> Subject: Re: gmail spam help >> >> I'd be interested to know how you can be so adamant about the lack of >> spam from this specific server. A great percentage of the spam hitting >> servers I have visibility into comes from very similar kinds of set ups >> because they tend to have little or no over sight in place. >> >> Also, lots of commercial email gets flagged as spam by users, even when >> they opted in for the email. If enough people flagged email from this >> server as spam it will cause Google to consider other email from the same >> small server as likely to be spam as well. Small systems, especially new >> ones, tend to unintentionally look like spam sources by not having proper >> reverse records, making sure you have SPF set up for the domain, etc. >> >> >> Scott Helms >> Vice President of Technology >> ZCorum >> (678) 507-5000 >> -------------------------------- >> http://twitter.com/kscotthelms >> -------------------------------- >> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Alex Rubenstein <a...@corp.nac.net >> <mailto:a...@corp.nac.net>> wrote: >> I should have been clearer. >> >> I have been getting complaints from my sales folks that when they send >> emails to people who use gmail (either a gmail account or google apps) that >> they recipient is reporting that the email is ending up in the Spam folder. >> So, I tested this myself, sending an email from a...@corp.nac.net<mailto: >> a...@corp.nac.net><mailto:a...@corp.nac.net<mailto:a...@corp.nac.net>> >> to rubenstei...@gmail.com<mailto:rubenstei...@gmail.com><mailto: >> rubenstei...@gmail.com<mailto:rubenstei...@gmail.com>> >> >> [cid:image001.png@01D046AD.3B2FA890] >> >> This is curious to me, since @corp.nac.net<http://corp.nac.net> is a >> small exchange implementation with only about 50 users behind it, and there >> is no question that there is no spamming going on from here. >> >> So, it’s not a question of adding a filter or not using gmail; it is not >> me who is using gmail in this problem. >> >> >> >> From: Josh Luthman [mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto: >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>] >> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:32 AM >> To: Alex Rubenstein >> Cc: NANOG list >> Subject: Re: gmail spam help >> >> >> Create a filter. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340<tel:937-552-2340> >> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:937-552-2343> >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Feb 12, 2015 8:11 AM, "Alex Rubenstein" <a...@corp.nac.net<mailto:alex >> @corp.nac.net><mailto:a...@corp.nac.net<mailto:a...@corp.nac.net>>> >> wrote: >> Is there anyone on-list that can help me with a world -> gmail email >> issue, where email is being considering spam by gmail erroneously? >> >> Thanks. >> >> > > -- > Daniel Taylor VP Operations Vocal Laboratories, Inc. > dtay...@vocalabs.com http://www.vocalabs.com/ (612)235-5711 > >
