On 2014-10-23 12:33, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Sounds like you want to see the rirs make sure they get rpki work
dine and widely available with the least encumbrances on the network
operator community as possible.
Or focus on more short/intermediate term returns like fortifying all
the existing systems and automating processes that are already deployed
and focus on ROI of members and operational buffers required by the
community _today. E.g., IRR training and investment rather than RPKI,
which this thread began with.
I'd continue and say in-addr.arpa or the like for resource
certification because RPKI is so ugly, silly without a single root
aligned with number resource allocations, etc.., but that'd require
response cycles I'm not going to spend there.
Did you see wes's slides / talk at the last nanog?
I did (after).
Aside, I understand why the ARIN board did what they did with the RPA
and I don't blame them -- it seemed well considered to me, but that's
just me.
Reminded of Taleb's "Fat Tony" quote [paraphrased]: If the pilot ain't
on the plane, you probably don't want to get on it,
-danny
