On 6/18/14 2:44 PM, "John R. Levine" <jo...@iecc.com> wrote:
>> I find the /50 particularly odd as it's not a nibble boundary and very >> close to /48. It's almost certain this is an operator who fails to >>grasp >> that they could have easily gotten a larger allocation from their RIR >>if >> they just asked for it and provided the appropriate justification in >> terms of giving /48s to their customers. OTOH, it's far better than >> those ridiculous providers that are screwing over their customers with >> /56s or even worse, /60s. > >It's Time-Warner, and they are not ignorant. I think they're >experimenting. They are still working out bugs in their internal >routing, >since my v6 routes have an annoying habit of disappearing inside their >network if I don't do a ping that passes through them every couple of >minutes. > >Also, it may not actuallly be a /50. That's what their rwhois says, but >I haven't done a tcpdump so I don't know what size they're actually >offering me. It's either a /64 or a /56 or a misconfiguration. Lee
