Subject: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)] Date: Fri, May 02, 2014 at 03:58:42PM -0600 Quoting Chris Grundemann (cgrundem...@gmail.com):
> Would you expound a bit on what you mean here? I don't quite follow but I > am very interested to understand the issue. The fact that you need v4 space to build a MPLS backbone is a very good reason to not waste a /10 on CGN crap. Ideally, we would have a solution where an entire MPLS infrastructure could be built without v4 space, demoting v4 to a legacy application inside a VRF, but the MPLS standards wg seems content with status quo. -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 I wish I was a sex-starved manicurist found dead in the Bronx!!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
