Le 2014-04-19 06:23, Florian Weimer a écrit : >>> I agree with Bill. You can poopoo NAT all you want, but it's a fact >>> of most networks and will continue to remain so until you can make a >>> compelling case to move away from it. >> >> Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT? > > In the sense that they "MUST be able to provide email filtering > features": yes.
That requirement should be removed. >> Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to >> all IPv6 firewalls. > > The document has more than just base requirements. The document is flawed as-is. Simon
