* Simon Perreault: > Le 2014-04-18 13:25, Mike Hale a écrit : >> I agree with Bill. You can poopoo NAT all you want, but it's a fact >> of most networks and will continue to remain so until you can make a >> compelling case to move away from it. > > Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT?
In the sense that they "MUST be able to provide email filtering features": yes. > Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to > all IPv6 firewalls. The document has more than just base requirements.
