On 4/18/14 4:33 PM, "George Herbert" <george.herb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >If William and I fight that fight, lose it, and come back and tell you >"They won't go because insufficient NAT" you need to listen. I've fought >this in a dozen places and lost 8 of them, not because I don't know v6, >but >because the clients have inertia and politics around security posture >changes (and in some cases, PCI compliance regs).
IPv6 evangelists are used to fighting inertia. PCI, however. . . anyone have any contacts there? Lee
