> I am not sure I understand the argument here. If you think that ARIN > is not representing the address space holders in proper fashion, how > would we suggest correcting that?
i have made off the cuff suggestions. but seriously, i would seek real external governance counsel. > If an address holder does not become a member (which is fairly easy to > do if you care enough) how would we even know what their concerns or > feelings are? read my lips > the number of /24s is not proportional to the total number of members which is why i asked both questions > Given that the US Gov't holds a vast amount of the legacy space skews > the results a lot. They might or might not be a "member" but they > certainly hold a lot of influence in ARINs operation as the one who > controls the contract. If ARIN was to cross them the wrong way, they > might not be holding that contract very long. there is no such contract. arin is not the icann or iana. randy
