FYI He tells everyone they¹re cute. Don¹t buy his tricks, he doesn¹t call back the next morning.
;) Ps. Take it easy on each other. It¹s the beginning of spring.. Head outside.. Go have a beer.. Smoke a joint.. What I am getting at is.. It¹s possible you guys should relax and realize that in the grand scheme of things a lot of this really doesn¹t matter. Go be humans beings in the world, the internet and this flame thread will still be here as it has been for generations (internet generations, anyways..) Just my .02 WOOOOOSAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH On 3/24/14, 4:53 PM, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >>>> You propose stateless NAT64 as an viable alternative to CGN. > ^^^ >>> where do i do that? >> Nick Hilliard > >ahh. i see your error. i am not nick hilliard. he's the cute one. > >> Your reply (verbosity added for clarity): "[Sure it is! Unlike where >> folks solve their problem with CGN, v6 to v4 protocol translation] can >> be stateless." > >again, you put words in my mouth which were not there. i did not say v6 >to v4 translation. > >> Nah, I'm done following bread crumbs for the day. > >cool. then we can all go back to reality and whet people actually said. > >bye > >randy > > >
