On Monday, March 24, 2014 01:37:52 AM Timothy Morizot wrote: > Yes. As I said, same general sorts of risks for the most > part as in IPv4. Details differ, but same general types. > My point was that it's mostly FUD to wave the flag of > scary new security weaknesses with no mitigations in > IPv6. It's the same general sort of first hop and link > security issues that exist in IPv4 with similar > mitigations. Not identical, but not radically different > or new either.
While the mitigations may not exist yet (like proper firewalls in CPE to protect GUA'ed devices in the home), it still a good idea to bring the risks to light so folk can think about how to get them fixed. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
