On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> wrote: > * William Herrin >> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >>>> don't believe for a moment that v6 to v4 protocol translation is any less >>>> ugly than CGN. >>> >>> it can be stateless >> >> You're smarter than that. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6145 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-05 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-anderson-siit-dc-00
And all those IPv4 addresses for the 1:1 translation required by the stateless version are coming from where exactly? And then only for the v6 hosts you've configured in the v6 address range for which v4 translation is allowed (no SLAAC!). Like I told Randy: you're smarter than that. -Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
