On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobb...@arbor.net> wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 2014, at 3:37 AM, John Curran <jcur...@arin.net> wrote: > > > It's also true that if a sizable group of network operators were to > actually deploy source address validation (thus proving that it really is a > reasonable approach and doesn't carry too much operational or vendor > implications), then it would be quite reasonable for those operators to > bring the results to NANOG and get it recognized as a best current > operating practice for networks of similar design/purpose. > > Many already do - including operators of very large networks. There are > operational, vendor, and topological considerations which mean that it's > achieved utilizing various mechanisms in different scenarios. > Documenting those various mechanisms which are actually utilized is the key here. =) $0.02 ~Chris -- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com
