-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2/4/2014 10:47 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:09:02 -0800, Paul Ferguson said: > >> I'd like to echo Jared's sentiment here -- collectively >> speaking, service providers need to figure out a way to deal with >> this issue, before some congresscritters start to try to >> introduce legislation that will force you to to do it in a way >> that no one will like. > > Can somebody explain to me why those who run eyeball networks are > able to block outbound packets when the customer hasn't paid their > bill, but can't seem to block packets that shouldn't be coming from > that cablemodem? > > (And yes, I know that in the first case, it urges the customer to > cough up the bucks, and in the second case, it's usually not a > revenue generator) > It's a dichotomy that is... unexplainable for me personally. - - ferg - -- Paul Ferguson VP Threat Intelligence, IID PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlLxNz8ACgkQKJasdVTchbJq6AEApzaaZ9PpPX30kUYAxsGZFzeV WR98y6VBxlocQE2oQFkBANSa4m0/JOGv+PDQovI4xSkjaE/Ru0V8woagAs1hS1C0 =KAL8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
