Don't fight it. It's clear that implementation on a per-packet basis of RFC4824 (datagrams over Semaphore Flag Signaling System) would have prevented this entire situation.
Refer to sections 3.3 and 3.4. -j On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgs...@mykolab.com> wrote: > > > On 2/2/2014 2:17 PM, Cb B wrote: > > > And, i agree bcp38 would help but that was published 14 years ago. > > But what? Are you somehow implying that because BCP38 was > "...published 14 years ago" (RFC2267 was initially published in 1998, > and it was subsequently replaced by RFC2827)?
