In any event, I'm pretty sure that I'd rather get hit with "tampering with evidence" versus them retrieving data that may incriminate me. I believe this may be a the "lesser of two evils" game.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Kyle Creyts [mailto:kyle.cre...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 2:52 PM > To: Jeroen van Aart > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please > help if you can. > > In most jurisdictions, wouldn't using a de-gaussing ring in the door > frame to wipe any equipment being removed constitute "tampering with > evidence" or interfering with an investigation if the authority in > question is in possession of a warrant/subpoena? > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jeroen van Aart <jer...@mompl.net> > wrote: > > > On 11/30/2012 02:02 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote: > > > >> OK, there must be a lot more paranoid people out there than I > thought > >> > > > > for awhile? I am sure he will let you out to go to the bank, get > > your > >> stuff, and leave town. I think you have seen way to many movies. > >> > > > > So if the cops show up at his door tomorrow and say "Here's all your > >> stuff back, there was no evidence of a crime.", you are OK with this > >> guys keeping the "defense fund"? > >> > > > > I for one vote for installing a de-gauging ring in your door frame. > > any removal of equipment you don't approve of will be wiped. That and > > encryption possibly combined with hiding the "real" OS (truecrypt can > > do that). > > > > Greetings, > > Jeroen > > > > -- > > Earthquake Magnitude: 5.1 > > Date: Monday, December 17, 2012 17:46:48 UTC > > Location: central East Pacific Rise > > Latitude: -3.9682; Longitude: -104.0375 > > Depth: 15.70 km > > > > > > > -- > Kyle Creyts > > Information Assurance Professional > BSidesDetroit Organizer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
