On 14/09/2012 12:38, Paul Thornton wrote: > Veering slightly off-topic for NANOG, but is this worth taking onto the > address policy mailing list ahead of RIPE65 to ensure people who aren't in > the WG session are aware of the issue - and can therefore support (or > question) any proposed changes?
I just posted to ap-wg about this: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-September/007183.html Nick
