On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:10:59 -0400, Arturo Servin said:
>       Wouldn't BCP38 help?

The mail I'm replying to has as the first Received: line:

Received: from ?IPv6:2800:af:ba30:e8cf:d06f:4881:973a:c68?  
([2800:af:ba30:e8cf:d06f:4881:973a:c68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id  
b8sm25918444anm.4.2012.06.17.10.11.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);  Sun, 
17 Jun 2012 10:11:06 -0700 (PDT)

Obviously BCP38 doesn't help, as it's an established TCP connection so it can't 
be
spoofed traffic (gotta ACK  Google's ISN from the SYN-ACK)  - unless Google is 
silly
enough to *still* not be doing RFC1948 properly.  I mean, Steve Bellovin wrote
that literally last century. ;)

So - who owns 2800:af:ba30:e8cf:4881:973a:c68?  And how does an LEO
find that info quickly if they need to figure out who to hand a warrant to?

*THAT* is the problem that needs solving.

(And who *does* own that IP?   I admit not knowing. ;)

Attachment: pgpEmzCnZyz0u.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to