On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:37 PM, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
>>> "We have a contractual relationship with our customer to announce that 
>>> space.  We have neither a contractual relationship (in this context) with 
>>> the RIR nor the RIR's customer.  The RIR and/or the RIR's customer should 
>>> resolve this issue with our customer."
>> Contracts are generally not a valid reason to be breaking laws.
>
> Which law?

Tortious interference at the very least. Or did you mean criminal law
as opposed to common law?

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com  b...@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

Reply via email to