On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:37 PM, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote: >>> "We have a contractual relationship with our customer to announce that >>> space. We have neither a contractual relationship (in this context) with >>> the RIR nor the RIR's customer. The RIR and/or the RIR's customer should >>> resolve this issue with our customer." >> Contracts are generally not a valid reason to be breaking laws. > > Which law?
Tortious interference at the very least. Or did you mean criminal law as opposed to common law? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
