Partially agree, Extreme has a "quit" good TCL implementation, and you can develop a lot of things around that. The system is able to reconfigure itself without external management console (SNMP)
Fabien Le 27 janv. 2012 à 14:53, Drew Weaver a écrit : > I would like to point out that in my experience if you do a lot of > coding/devops/automation work with SNMP extreme is a lot harder to work with > than Cisco and some of their OIDs/MIBs produce unusual results. > > Thanks, > -Drew > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 3:54 AM > To: Erik Bais > Cc: nanog list > Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton > > I have experience with the Extreme's Alpine, Blackdiamond, x250, and x450 and > i discovered that the command line is fairly different than Cisco, HP, or > Dell. However, since they are a relatively small company with a small but > strong customer base, their support is fairly good. I can't speak for > 10G/40G implementations, but from my experiences, they support has a quick > response time and they do quite a bit of lab replication to figure out the > exact root cause. > > -Grant > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Erik Bais <eb...@a2b-internet.com> wrote: > >> We have a full purple network, so my answer for this would be Extreme >> Networks. >> >> Check out the Lipis report on the X670 / x670v 48 port 10G 1U switches. >> >> vs other vendor equipment : >> >> http://www.extremenetworks.com/libraries/products/ExtremeX670V_Lippis% >> 20Report_Fall.pdf >> >> >> Regards, >> Erik Bais >> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >> >> Op Jan 26, 2012 om 21:20 heeft Deric Kwok <deric.kwok2...@gmail.com> >> het volgende geschreven: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test >>> around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port! >>> >>> Thank you >>> >> >> >
