Thank you. This is somewhat of a learning opportunity for me. I hit all
the generic Internet health sites and I understand that there IS an
issue. Now I'm getting to learn how you guys attempt to understand WHY
we had an issue.
But my point is the same. If this is the case than the entire month of
November reflects "instability" where I see transitions from 600k to 1M
between updates. Yet we didn't experience the same negative customer
experience for those. So how do you see the difference with todays
events? Digging into files now.
-Hammer-
"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer
On 11/07/2011 10:45 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Nov 7, 2011, at 11:41 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
So the file size was 30% higher implies that the number of updates is larger and
therefore there is instability? I see the logic but if you scroll thru that page
(the whole month of November) there are tons of>1M files. Trying to see what is
different about today....
This is an easy benchmark to gauge overall stability. Large files mean
something was unstable. Then you need to actually look at them to see *why*.
Also since the files are compressed you lose some visibility into what is
really in them.
- Jared
