+1
On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote: > > I have been at other conference that have triple or more participants, and it > has never been anything close to the issues we are having at this hotel. > Slightly slower performance is expected. Completely not working is not. > > -Randy > > ----- Original Message ----- >> In my historical knowledge of this: there are only so many venues >> that can have 500-650 people and fit. >> >> Jared Mauch >> >> On Oct 10, 2011, at 1:12 PM, "Frank Bulk" <frnk...@iname.com> wrote: >> >>> Then the RFP for the meeting needs to be more specific with some >>> basic SLAs >>> that result in a smaller bill if not met. >>> >>> Frank >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com] >>> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:44 AM >>> To: Randy Carpenter >>> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group >>> Subject: Re: meeting network >>> >>>> I would think that the contract with the hotel for the conference >>>> would include the specific requirements for the network. Is that >>>> not >>>> the case? >>> >>> underlying problems >>> >>> o no hotel believe that we'll actually be significantly high use. >>> they simply can not conceive of it. ietf, apricot, ... have >>> seen this time and time again >>> >>> o the hotel does not manage the network, so you have two comms >>> hops >>> to anyone who can do anything. and anyway, they are not going >>> to >>> provision more bandwidth >>> >>> but the problems of which i spoke were the meeting network. which >>> we >>> do supposedly control. >>> >>> randy >>> >>> >>> >> >>
