On 1/12/2011 11:52 AM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
I'd argue that the above has everything to do with firewalling, and nothing to do with NAT.
I agree, but both effectively handle the job. My point is that just because we have lots of infections behind NAT, doesn't mean that NAT (or a firewall) doesn't still serve a purpose.
Slightly OT: It boggles the mind a bit when I find desktop shops -not- using imaging. I would think most people would prefer not to stare at OS install screens - and when you can blast out a fully patched XP image easily in sub-10 minutes, the ROI is staggering.
Hardware drivers? Jack
