On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Jack Bates wrote: > > > On 1/12/2011 11:01 AM, George Bonser wrote: >> NAT66 is just >> straight static NAT that maps one prefix to a different prefix. >> > > I'd eat a hat if a vendor didn't implement a PAT equivalent. It's demanded > too much. There is money for it, so it will be there. > > > Jack
Fortunately, so far, it isn't. Hopefully we can cure the demand through education instead of acquiescence and profiteering. Owen
