On 1/14/11 11:49 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/14/2011 1:43 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:Ah, but, the point here is that NAT actually serves as an enabling technology for part of the attack he is describing. Another example where NAT can and is a security negative. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge these is exactly what you were accusing me of doing in my previous emails.Explain how it acts as an enabler.
Consider the impact the typical NAT or "firewall" has on DNS. -Doug
