On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
Seriously, though, you're welcome to use fd00::/8 for exactly that
purpose. The problem is that you (and hopefully it stays this way) won't
have much luck finding a vendor that will provide the NAT for you to do
it with.
[with my flame-retardant hat installed firmly]
So what's the IPV6 solution for PCI compliance, where 1.3.8 requires the
use of RFC1918 space? Admitedly, it's been a year or two since I last had
to engineer around that particular set of rules...but it's life or death
for a lot of folks.
--
david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
dr...@icantclick.org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
