On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:18:31AM -0500, david raistrick wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> Seriously, though, you're welcome to use fd00::/8 for exactly that >> purpose. The problem is that you (and hopefully it stays this way) >> won't have much luck finding a vendor that will provide the NAT for you >> to do it with. > > [with my flame-retardant hat installed firmly] > > So what's the IPV6 solution for PCI compliance, where 1.3.8 requires the > use of RFC1918 space? Admitedly, it's been a year or two since I last > had to engineer around that particular set of rules...but it's life or > death for a lot of folks.
Simple. Use RFC1918 IPv4 along side global IPv6 addresses. Done :-)
