On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:32 PM, James Hess wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: >> of running RIPng. The thought of letting Belkin routers (if you can call >> them that) into the routing table scares me no end. > > I think that indeed looks scary. I wouldn't be too concerned about the > Belkin routers. > How many SP routers are really designed to deal with mass numbers of > RIP adjacencies? > RIP doesn't have adjacencies, per se. It's basically a stateless broadcast based protocol. As such, the number of routers really has no major impact other than the traffic level generated by all those broadcasts.
Owen
