On 10/6/10 10:34 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 7/10/10 12:08 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
so ... should domains associated with asn(s) and addr block allocations
be subject to some expiry policy other than "it goes into the drop pool
and one of {enom,pool,...} acquire it (and the associated non-traffic
assets) for any interested party at $50 per /24"?
Interesting idea, but how do you apply it to ccTLD domains with widely
varying policies. All it takes is whois records being legitimately
updated to use domain contacts using a ccTLD domain to circumvent.
Sounds like more of a stop-gap measure.
Regards,
Ben
Number resources are not and should not be associated with domain
resources at the policy level. This would make absolutely no sense
whatsoever.
hmm. ... "are not" ... so the event complained of ... didn't happen?
