On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote: > On 7/10/10 12:08 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote: >> so ... should domains associated with asn(s) and addr block allocations >> be subject to some expiry policy other than "it goes into the drop pool >> and one of {enom,pool,...} acquire it (and the associated non-traffic >> assets) for any interested party at $50 per /24"? > > Interesting idea, but how do you apply it to ccTLD domains with widely > varying policies. All it takes is whois records being legitimately > updated to use domain contacts using a ccTLD domain to circumvent. > Sounds like more of a stop-gap measure. > > > Regards, > Ben > >
Number resources are not and should not be associated with domain resources at the policy level. This would make absolutely no sense whatsoever. Owen