On 7/10/10 12:08 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> so ... should domains associated with asn(s) and addr block allocations
> be subject to some expiry policy other than "it goes into the drop pool
> and one of {enom,pool,...} acquire it (and the associated non-traffic
> assets) for any interested party at $50 per /24"?Interesting idea, but how do you apply it to ccTLD domains with widely varying policies. All it takes is whois records being legitimately updated to use domain contacts using a ccTLD domain to circumvent. Sounds like more of a stop-gap measure. Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
