On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:48:52 -0600 Tom Ammon <tom.am...@utah.edu> wrote:
> RFC1918 is a good place to start ;) > Most of the issues in "Deprecating Site Local Addresses" http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3879.txt identified in IPv6 Site-Local addressing also apply to duplicated/overlapping IPv4 addressing. > On 3/18/2010 10:22 AM, Jaren Angerbauer wrote: > > Thanks all for the on / off list responses on this. I acknowledge I'm > > playing in territory I'm not familiar with, and was a bad idea to jump > > to the conclusion that this range was private. I made that assumption > > originally because the entire /8 was owned by APNIC, and just figured > > since the registrar owned them, it must have been a private range. :S > > > > It sounds like this range was just recently assigned -- is there any > > document (RFC?) or source I could look through to learn more about > > this, and/or provide evidence to my client? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jaren > > > > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tom Ammon > Network Engineer > Office: 801.587.0976 > Mobile: 801.674.9273 > > Center for High Performance Computing > University of Utah > http://www.chpc.utah.edu > >
