On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:40:19AM -0600, Dan White wrote: > On 05/03/10 12:39 +0000, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > > er... what part of dual-stack didn't you understand? > > dual-stack consumes exactly the same number of v4 and v6 addresses. > > I would expect the number of v6 addresses assigned to a host to be a > multiple of the number of v4 addresses, depending on the type of host.
true that... i was being - perhaps - too literal. > > imho - the path through the woods is an IVI-like solution. > > Or, dual stack today. When you've run out of IPv4 addresses for new end > users, set them up an IPv6 HTTP proxy, SMTP relay and DNS resolver and/or > charge a premium for IPv4 addresses when you start to sweat. > and then we are back to drc's comments. > -- > Dan White