If it's not obvious, I've thoguht about this and made some offers to the people at APNIC/RIPE.
Hoping someone moves forward with this. The note was on the apops list (iirc). - jared On Feb 4, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Tico wrote: > On 2/4/10 2:14 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: >> I know someone who'd happily sink both the /24's in question.. if apnic's >> interested. >> > Ditto. > >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jared Mauch<ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote: >> >> >>> On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Kevin Loch wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Mirjam Kuehne wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some >>>>> >>> measurements to find out how "polluted" this block really is. >>> >>>>> See some surprising results on RIPE Labs: >>>>> >>> http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18 >>> >>>>> Please also note the call for feedback at the bottom of the article. >>>>> >>>> The most surprising thing in that report was that someone has an AMS-IX >>>> port at just 10 megs. It would be nice to see an actual measurement of >>>> the traffic and daily/weekly changes. A breakdown of the flow data by >>>> source ASN and source prefix (for the top 50-100 sources) would also be >>>> interesting. >>>> >>> There was a call on the apnic list for someone to sink some of the traffic. >>> >>> I'd like to see someone capture the data and post pcaps/netflow analysis, >>> and possibly just run a http server on that /24 so people can test if their >>> network is broken. >>> >>> I've taken a peek at the traffic, and I don't think it's 100's of megs, but >>> without a global view who knows. >>> >>> - Jared >>> >>> >
