> I read the article and the follow up posts and I wonder if we are all > using the same definition for "speed" here. The article seems to > imply you don't get 6 Mbps on your DSL line in summer because the > copper is hotter and it's harder to push electrons down the link. > That is clearly BS, the clock is ticking six million times per second, > period.
Are you trying to say that the *actual* DSL speed, as synchronised between the modems at either end, is neither a) affected by the physical characteristics of the copper pair, nor b) variable? I agree the article is woolly between line-speed, throughput, goodput, congestion, etc, but to say that DSL line speed is in any way fixed in the same way that Ethernet or PDH / SDH lines are is contrary to every DSL platform I've worked with. (Also, 6Mb/s DSL doesn't equate to 6 million ticks per second in anything relating to pushing electrons onto the wire. Remember, it's modem technology, just faster - your baud rate is still much lower than your bps.) Regards, Tim.
